On 4 Sep 2007, at 23:36, Dan North wrote: > If we come up with a programming language-independent way of > representing specs, then I'm all for a .spec suffix. (Perhaps the > specdoc descriptions might be something along those lines.)
Good point. I did consider suggesting .rspec as an extention for that reason. Think I will stick to _spec.rb for now. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
