On 4-nov-2008, at 17:20, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 4 Nov 2008, at 16:09, Stephen Eley wrote:
Pat, Ashley, David and Aslak give quite share of their time
answering
those emails, do a search and you will find out.
That's not a replacement for good documentation. You have to have a
certain grounding before you can even figure out where to go and what
questions to ask -- and I don't feel the most visible resources for
that grounding are as good as they could be.
This is a point I've made before (and David has rightly pointed me
at the source of the rspec.info website), but I'm now so immersed
in RSpec myself I would find it hard to see the gaps in the
documentation, I think. Plus I'm lazy, and, y'know, busy at work.
I almost wonder whether it would be worth ripping up the rspec.info
site and pointing everyone at the github wiki, then putting some
real effort into making that as good as it can be.
That would be a good idea. No more rspec.info and
rspec.rubyforge.net, but just github and The Book. The Book would be
nice.. Already have an empty slot reserved on my bookshelf ;)
cheers,
bartz
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
