On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Bart Zonneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4-nov-2008, at 17:20, Matt Wynne wrote: > >> On 4 Nov 2008, at 16:09, Stephen Eley wrote: >>>> >>>> Pat, Ashley, David and Aslak give quite share of their time answering >>>> those emails, do a search and you will find out. >>> >>> That's not a replacement for good documentation. You have to have a >>> certain grounding before you can even figure out where to go and what >>> questions to ask -- and I don't feel the most visible resources for >>> that grounding are as good as they could be. >> >> This is a point I've made before (and David has rightly pointed me at the >> source of the rspec.info website), but I'm now so immersed in RSpec myself I >> would find it hard to see the gaps in the documentation, I think. Plus I'm >> lazy, and, y'know, busy at work. >> >> I almost wonder whether it would be worth ripping up the rspec.info site >> and pointing everyone at the github wiki, then putting some real effort into >> making that as good as it can be. > > That would be a good idea. No more rspec.info and rspec.rubyforge.net, but > just github and The Book. The Book would be nice.. Already have an empty > slot reserved on my bookshelf ;) >
Your real bookshelf, or your Shelfari one? :) http://www.shelfari.com/ -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com http://www.mutuallyhuman.com _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
