On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:42 PM, David Chelimsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Stephen Eley <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2009/3/19 Rick DeNatale <[email protected]>: >>> Even 'should be' is a bit grating. I'm tempted to write a pair of matchers >>> like be_truthy and be_falsy, but I was wondering what other RSpec users have >>> to say. >> > > what_follows.should be_brilliant
ugh I think you've just reopened the debate over whether we ought to use should/is/must/etc :) That was fantastic Stephen, thanks! _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
