David Chelimsky wrote: > I'd recommend using the route_to matcher that was added in 1.2.9 > instead. > > http://codepad.org/fLcxyA9N > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec-rails/1.2.9/classes/Spec/Rails/Matchers.html#M000029 > > It's more reliable, and aligns better with the rspec matchers API. > > Cheers, > David
Thanks for that, David. I updated my spec (http://codepad.org/F828X7Fg). For some reason though, it's still failing: http://codepad.org/s65Ckubc Just in case, this is what I have in routes.rb: http://codepad.org/rJfIhbM6 There must be some tiny detail that I'm missing here... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
