Randy Harmon wrote:
> On 1/11/10 9:22 PM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
>>> Cheers,
>>> David
>>>
>> Thanks for that, David. I updated my spec (http://codepad.org/F828X7Fg).
>> For some reason though, it's still failing: http://codepad.org/s65Ckubc
>>
>> Just in case, this is what I have in routes.rb:
>> http://codepad.org/rJfIhbM6
>>
>> There must be some tiny detail that I'm missing here...
>>
> Yes, there must. I think you've tried to twice define the route, and
> the test shows you which one actually is being used. I'll suggest
> commenting out one of those routes at a time, and see whether the new
> test results are illuminating.
>
> Randy
I swapped the order of the 2 lines in routes.rb to this:
map.connect 'foods/search/:name', :controller => 'foods', :action
=> 'search'
map.resources :foods, :collection => {:search => :get}
and the spec passes now.
Thanks, guys!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
