I have to say that I completely disagree. This should be done, by the RPC, and
hosted at authors.ietf.org. It should categorically not be in a policy document.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 08-Jun-25 17:07, Eliot Lear wrote:
I agree that we need something to demonstrate the dos and do nots, and some
pointers to tools that can be used. I am not sure that needs to be in the RFC,
but it certainly should be an informational reference. This is especially the
case with SVG which has been quite difficult for authors to deliver into an RFC.
Eliot
On 07.06.2025 23:19, Rob Sayre wrote:
Hi,
Shouldn't the document have several example SVGs? I'm not opposed to this plan,
but I found myself wondering how some extremely basic features would work in an
RFC, especially given varying output formats. The document itself should
demonstrate the variations.
I even wondered about simple things like what the value of "viewBox" should be.
But, if it's easy, we should probably drop in 5 or 10.
thanks,
Rob
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
