Hi,
Jean Mahoney <jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> Other responsive design concepts,
> such as including CSS to support dark mode, don't appear to be necessary
> (SVGs in current RFCs look okay in dark mode).
Yes, it works well in this one ("htmlized"):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8899
And it responds to system changes in the settings, so it already has the
code that reacts to that change. But this version, "html", does not respond
to dark/light mode changes at all (only light mode):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8899.html
It could just be a matter of changing the HTML/CSS/JS on that version, but
it's hard to tell. If you get down to
https://authors.ietf.org/en/diagrams#examples
That links to the ones that don't change color schemes. But, since this
document obsoletes RFC 7996, it also obsoletes the Relax NG schema in
there, right?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7996#appendix-A
That RNC schema allows style elements that could screw up the inherited
colors, but this is what the "svgcheck" tool allows. I think it is an edge
case, though.
thanks,
Rob
--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
