Okay, in an earlier email in this thread [1] Paul Hoffman (I think) suggested wording like
* SVG diagrams may not be interactive or have multimedia or other similar elements. What about that for new wording? Alexis [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/iqz2v05Wt-ncTJUsEvITw_50RGY/ On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 5:37 PM Jean Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 6/10/25 4:55 PM, Alexis Rossi wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 2:24 PM Brian Carpenter > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > > > Make the policy "generally not allowed" and that would leave the RPC > > free to apply common sense. > > > > (via tiny screen & keyboard) > > Regards, > > Brian Carpenter > > > > > > Okay so like this perhaps? > > > > OLD > > "SVGs must render in a single static configuration without dynamic > > elements or responsive design features." > > > > NEW > > "The content of SVGs should be static. Dynamic elements or responsive > > design features are generally not allowed." > > [JM] We should emphasize which responsive design features we don't want > to support, like animation, because we do want to allow scaling, which > also falls into responsive design. Other responsive design concepts, > such as including CSS to support dark mode, don't appear to be necessary > (SVGs in current RFCs look okay in dark mode). I would need to more info > to determine if SVG CSS should be disallowed generally. It seems like it > would be helpful for improving accessibility, but maybe that can all be > inherited from the HTML CSS? > > NEW > The content of SVGs should be static. Dynamic elements or responsive > design features that support animation are generally not allowed. > > Best regards, > Jean > > > > > > > Alexis > > > > > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2025, 09:17 Eliot Lear, <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > __ > > > > I would suggest that the proscriptions of video, audio, and > > animations are not controversial. The only aspect of responsive > > design I really think we're talking about is dark mode, in that > > if it is supported it must be done in a way that is legible. > > Maybe that is a bit TOO prescriptive, tho. > > > > > > -- > > rswg mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:rswg@rfc- > > editor.org> > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > >
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
