On 11-Jun-25 14:17, Alexis Rossi wrote:
Okay, in an earlier email in this thread [1] Paul Hoffman (I think) suggested
wording like
* SVG diagrams may not be interactive or have multimedia or other similar
elements.
What about that for new wording?
That WFM too.
Brian
Alexis
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/iqz2v05Wt-ncTJUsEvITw_50RGY/
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/iqz2v05Wt-ncTJUsEvITw_50RGY/>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 5:37 PM Jean Mahoney <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 6/10/25 4:55 PM, Alexis Rossi wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 2:24 PM Brian Carpenter
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
> Make the policy "generally not allowed" and that would leave the RPC
> free to apply common sense.
>
> (via tiny screen & keyboard)
> Regards,
> Brian Carpenter
>
>
> Okay so like this perhaps?
>
> OLD
> "SVGs must render in a single static configuration without dynamic
> elements or responsive design features."
>
> NEW
> "The content of SVGs should be static. Dynamic elements or responsive
> design features are generally not allowed."
[JM] We should emphasize which responsive design features we don't want
to support, like animation, because we do want to allow scaling, which
also falls into responsive design. Other responsive design concepts,
such as including CSS to support dark mode, don't appear to be necessary
(SVGs in current RFCs look okay in dark mode). I would need to more info
to determine if SVG CSS should be disallowed generally. It seems like it
would be helpful for improving accessibility, but maybe that can all be
inherited from the HTML CSS?
NEW
The content of SVGs should be static. Dynamic elements or responsive
design features that support animation are generally not allowed.
Best regards,
Jean
>
> Alexis
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2025, 09:17 Eliot Lear, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
> __
>
> I would suggest that the proscriptions of video, audio, and
> animations are not controversial. The only aspect of responsive
> design I really think we're talking about is dark mode, in that
> if it is supported it must be done in a way that is legible.
> Maybe that is a bit TOO prescriptive, tho.
>
>
> --
> rswg mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:rswg@rfc- <mailto:rswg@rfc->
> editor.org <http://editor.org>>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
