It seems to me that "do not affection operational concerns" is either
too vague to be useful or significantly broader than most of us intend.
Yours,
Joel
On 6/20/2025 6:05 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
Hi,
> "Once published, RFCs may be reissued, but
> only syntactic or superficial changes that do
> not affect the syntax for protocols themselves
> may be made."
This statement is a bit circular. How about:
"Once published, RFCs may be reissued. Changes that do not affect
operational concerns are acceptable."
I am not sure who wrote:
> The chapeau is now inaccurate.
I know what this means in IETF-ese: "with/without hats". Do not switch
languages while using IETF jargon.
It is in a BCP:
"All participants, particularly those with English as a first
language, attempt to accommodate the needs of other participants by
communicating clearly, including speaking slowly and limiting the use
of slang." [0]
I know exactly what "chapeau" means, but this one is exclusionary.
thanks,
Rob
[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7154#section-2
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
