On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:17 AM Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > The draft is a little more aggressive than I expected, but I support it. > The issue is that putting these matters at the top /might/ help someone > seeing an RFC or I-D for the first time (I doubt it), but it's repeated for > people who read more than one document. So, the more you participate, the > more your attention is wasted. > One might think it would be easy to learn to skip it. But at least I find it annoying, because the front matter of a document varies in length. A long abstract might push the boilerplate down, maybe the introduction is not really the Introduction, etc. So, you're constantly scanning for the boilerplate.
-- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
