I see. Do you think as a matter of process we (RSWG) could simply write down a syntax for math notation and put it in the XML grammar?
-Ekr On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 4:12 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026, at 10:47, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Why do you think we are precluded from saying "shall"? S 2 uses must a > couple of > > times for matters that seem like they are at a similar altitude. > > In those cases, it relates to matters of series policy. We're saying that > RFCs need to be able to display math in an accessible and interoperable > way. But, as important as it is, the series is only about the artifacts in > the series (XML and output formats) not the process that is used to produce > those artifacts. That's a line we've walked with "Implementation Guidance" > in the past. >
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
