It appears that Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> said: >On 28-Jan-26 13:48, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> I see. Do you think as a matter of process we (RSWG) could simply write down >> a syntax for math notation and put it in the XML grammar? > >That isn't "policy" in my book. I think policy would be: There should be at >least one recommended way to embed math notation in XML2RFC, with the RPC >making the recommendation(s).
I think the policy should be 'there shall be exactly one (1) syntax for math notation." I don't care whether it's LaTeX or MathML or something else, but pick one and stick to it. RFCXML is too complicated already. For people who really really really hate whichever one we pick, there are mechanical ways to translate one to the other. Build some tools if you care that much. I also am not understanding how this is going to work in Legacy Line Printer Format (sometimes misleadingly called "plain text") unless it's just going to dump the MathML into the document. R's, John -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
