Re: should rsync also be called ssync?

[Andrew Tridgell]

I actually like the name rsync :)

I'd be very happy with a configure option that sets the default remote
shell, and I don't mind a argv[0] check that knows about the name
ssync, but I'd prefer for the package to still be called "rsync" as I
think the name is well enough known that a change at this stage would
not be a good idea.

btw, if you install as ssync you would have to also install as rsync
(presumably a symlink to ssync would be used) as otherwise the remote
operation of existing versions would fail.

Cheers, Tridge