I actually like the name rsync :) I'd be very happy with a configure option that sets the default remote shell, and I don't mind a argv[0] check that knows about the name ssync, but I'd prefer for the package to still be called "rsync" as I think the name is well enough known that a change at this stage would not be a good idea. btw, if you install as ssync you would have to also install as rsync (presumably a symlink to ssync would be used) as otherwise the remote operation of existing versions would fail. Cheers, Tridge
- should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Ashwin Mansinghka
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Robert Scholten
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Andrew Tridgell
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Michael James
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Martin Pool
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Philip Hands
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Martin Pool
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Andrew Tridgell
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? tim . conway