We're having a debate in which some are advocating changing a long-established and respected utility name, with the sole purpose of placating ignorant, inflexible-minded fools. Did anybody notice this? Tim Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 303.682.4917 Philips Semiconductor - Colorado TC 1880 Industrial Circle Suite D Longmont, CO 80501
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Andrew Tridgell
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Michael James
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Martin Pool
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Philip Hands
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Martin Pool
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Andrew Tridgell
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? tim . conway
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? tim . conway