On 9 Dec 2002, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Really a better FAQ editor process seems more useful. Isn't > this the purpose of a CVS and commit privileges -- set up one > or more trusted editors with rights, and delegate that aspect.
Anybody who wants to maintain the FAQ-O-Matic already has the necessary access. If somebody starts working on it and feels that CVS would be more appropriate then of course we can switch to that. > For the last year, I have acted as editor on the RPM website; > there is also an open editorial mailing list, and provided > content (dreadfully little) gets slotted in. > > I monitor all the mailing lists in the area (five primary > ones) and watch for common questions or misunderstandings > which are well answered end up summarized and on the site. I > particularly look for the postings by the lead maintainer and > a few others for the 'nuggets' -- the answers float by and may > be picked out of the stream and tossed up on the riverbank of > a FAQ Yes, that's the process I had in mind. It's just a matter of some set of people finding the time and motiviation to do it. -- Martin -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
