John J Foerch wrote: > So I may take up your suggestion for my own use, but I did want to put > forward the idea that since in my experience, trailing slash > interpretation is an often-mentioned stumbling-block for rsync users, > maybe it would be appropriate for rsync itself to provide a convenient > alternative.
I've also been using rsync for many years, and from right at the beginning, I started using the "dir/." syntax to not fall into that trap. It always works and is also nice to use in scripts as an accidental "dir/./." does not harm ;-) Have a nice day, Berny -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
