2008/3/29, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/3/29, Rainer Gerhards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I needed some time to digest all this myself ;) I've now done that and > > put it all into a HTML page. That doesn't imply it is the scheme we will > > finally use, but if so, it saves me some time. I have also described the > > development process a bit. I think this is vital for understanding why I > > need certain release numbers. The info is here (with the now irrelevant > > text at the end of the doc): > > > > http://www.rsyslog.com/doc-version_naming.html > > > > I am still a bit undecided if we really need to go v4 or can start this > > (or whatever else) in the v3 branch... > > > > Feedback appreciated. > > > What I'm missing from the document, is a distinction between stable > and unstable releases > (or are all releases with -rc? unstable and without stable?)
I.e., are -mf releases to be considered stable or not? Would the current 3.12.5 be an rc release in the new versioning scheme? Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
