2008/3/31, Florian Riedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > > I have just release rsyslog 3.13.0-dev0, which will hopefully become the > next stable release by mid-week. > > It fixes two bugs, one is a potential segfault in the syslog/plain tcp > receiver. The other one is removal of some debug instrumentation that > accidently made it into 3.12.5. There is also a new ./configure option > (--enable/disable-rsyslogd) which permits to build just specific plugins
Hm, the default of enable_rsyslogd should imho be "yes" > without the main binary. This has been added to support source-based > packaging systems (like in FreeBSD). This is also a test for one > potential new versioning scheme. I don't see the use case yet. Why would someone want to build the plugins without the rsyslogd binary? Does it actually work if you mix different versions of plugins and rsyslogd? If someone is interested in only a specific plugin, why not use "make -C plugins/foo"? Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
