2008/3/31, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/3/31, Florian Riedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have just release rsyslog 3.13.0-dev0, which will hopefully become the > > next stable release by mid-week. > > > > It fixes two bugs, one is a potential segfault in the syslog/plain tcp > > receiver. The other one is removal of some debug instrumentation that > > accidently made it into 3.12.5. There is also a new ./configure option > > (--enable/disable-rsyslogd) which permits to build just specific plugins > > > Hm, the default of enable_rsyslogd should imho be "yes" > > > > without the main binary. This has been added to support source-based > > packaging systems (like in FreeBSD). This is also a test for one > > potential new versioning scheme. > > > I don't see the use case yet. Why would someone want to build the > plugins without the rsyslogd binary? Does it actually work if you mix > different versions of plugins and rsyslogd? > If someone is interested in only a specific plugin, why not use "make > -C plugins/foo"?
Forgot to add: If you intend to build rsyslogd and rfc3195d conditionally, the corresponding man pages should also be installed conditionally. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
