Just for verification, what happens if you use:

*.info  @@(o)127.0.0.1:7777;RSYSLOG_SyslogProtocol23Format

Also, which rsyslog version do you use?

Rainer
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsyslog-boun...@lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog-
> boun...@lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Rodrian, Logan P (IS)
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 9:10 PM
> To: rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com
> Subject: [rsyslog] RFC 5424 over TCP Support
> 
> I have tried using the following in my rules, but am still receiving
> something that looks invalid.
> 
> RULES
> $ActionSendStreamDriver  ptcp
> $ActionForwardDefaultTemplateName  RSYSLOG_SyslogProtocol23Format
> *.info  @@(o)127.0.0.1:7777
> 
> RECEIVE
> "<4>Nov ..."
> 
> What is received still does not look like it is conforming to RFC 5424
> yet, even after adding the recommended template.  What am I doing
> wrong?
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rsyslog-boun...@lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog-
> > boun...@lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Rodrian, Logan P (IS)
> > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 3:00 PM
> > To: rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com
> > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] RFC 5424 over TCP Support
> >
> > Thank you for your reply.  I am now using the octet framing as you
> > prescribed, which seems to solve the original issue.  My next issue
> is
> > that the syslog message string does not appear to be RFC 5424
> formatted
> > (it looks like "<###>Nov ...."), versus:
> >
> >
> >       SYSLOG-MSG      = HEADER SP STRUCTURED-DATA [SP MSG]
> >
> >       HEADER          = PRI VERSION SP TIMESTAMP SP HOSTNAME
> >                         SP APP-NAME SP PROCID SP MSGID
> >       PRI             = "<" PRIVAL ">"
> >       PRIVAL          = 1*3DIGIT ; range 0 ..
> > 191<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5424#page-191>
> >       VERSION         = NONZERO-DIGIT 0*2DIGIT
> >
> >       ...
> >
> > Is there a setting or prebuilt template that will output the message
> in
> > RFC 5424 format?
> 
> 
> I should probably alias the template, it is called
> RSYSLOG_SyslogProtocol23Format - this stems back to the days when we
> used rsyslog as a testbed for the pre-RFC versions.
> 
> Rainer
> 
> 
> Logan Rodrian
> Cyber Engineer
> Northrop Grumman
> w (720) 744-7467
> m (303) 748-1649
> logan.rodr...@ngc.com
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a
> myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST
> if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to