Hi, +1 for one thing at the time. I wanted to point this out "early" before major investments are done in one direction or other.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Pavel Levshin <[email protected]> wrote: > > 15.12.2013 20:31, Otis Gospodnetic: > > > Hi, >> >> * main repo is on Github, but the issues are in some external Bugzilla >> instance, where users need separate accounts and that cannot cross-link to >> pull requests or where users cannot easily @GetSomebodysAttentionLikeThis >> > > There is no problem to crosslink, you can just post an URL. Doable, just less easy. And it's actually not quite the same because with Github, I *think* if you enter something like #issue in the merge then the comment made during the merge automatically gets added to the issue. I think. Something like that. > Separate accounts are annoying, right. Not everyone has account on GitHub, > by the way... And current bugzilla is not particularly comfortable, maybe > GitHub is better. > Not everyone is, but a LOT of people are. Apparently 3M about 1 year ago: http://www.quora.com/How-many-users-does-GitHub-have > If it would be trivial to migrate from Bugzilla to GitHub AND back again > (just in case, for the future), I'd vote for the migration. +1 * some docs are going to be in docs in some Github repo, but there are also >> docs on rsyslog.com >> > > Yes, and this can be fixed in future. There are different kinds of docs, > some of them are related to software, and some to the project. They do not > need to follow same rules. All of the docs will hopefully be accessible via > rsyslog.com. > May be good to include something in the generated docs to say where these docs are generated from and when they were generated. This will help people understand how fresh they are and where they need to go if they want to fix something in the docs. > I must admit that RST docs will be fine to read directly from GitHub web > interface, but they are harder to find there. You mean because they are in a separate repo or because there is no "index"? In either case, could this be fixed by including either the URL to the docs repo or the actual "index" in the rsyslog/rsyslog repo's README? > * Github has a Wiki, but it's not used and there is a separate Wiki on >> rsyslog.com and it requires a separate account (same or different from >> Bugzilla?) >> > > Now, this Wiki is nearly unused and unusable. Not every project even needs > a Wiki. I agree. Otis _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
