I don't have concerns about some functions but going OO, lua or anything Turing complete.
Sent from phone, thus brief. Am 22.05.2015 22:22 schrieb "singh.janmejay" <[email protected]>: > Just for clarity, by functions I mean in-built rainerscript functions, > not user defined functions. > > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:49 AM, singh.janmejay > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think a rich set of functions make it as complex as a > > full-blown programming language. Majority of richness of a real > > programming language comes from compositions over user-built > > constructs. Functions are just allowing for richer manipulation of > > control-flow and log-content, but not composition of user-created > > constructs (say structs, objects and methods, closures etc). > > > > I personally feel things like include or hasItem should be available > > as functions (external module sounds like an overkill for this). But > > for xml-parsing, a separate module makes total sense. > > > > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:42 AM, singh.janmejay > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> At the risk of digressing a bit, in some benchmarks I did in 2013 > >> luajit came out to be 2x to 4x faster, but its nowhere close to as > >> pluggable, doesn't give very clean hookup points etc. > >> If ever, i'd bet on Lua. > >> > >> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Marcus Rueckert <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> On 2015-05-22 21:58:30 +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > >>>> Use cases? > >>>> (Maintenance) effort required? > >>> > >>> 10 years is quite some time. especially luajit seems to kick ass in the > >>> speed department. look at Snabb Switch e.g. also the powerdns team > >>> reported some nice numbers for their lua based things > >>> (pdns,pdns-recursor,dnsdist). and nice speedups when they started > >>> testing with luajit. > >>> > >>> darix > >>> > >>> -- > >>> openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux > >>> openSUSE is good for you > >>> www.opensuse.org > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> rsyslog mailing list > >>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > >>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > >>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > >>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a > myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if > you DON'T LIKE THAT. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Janmejay > >> http://codehunk.wordpress.com > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Janmejay > > http://codehunk.wordpress.com > > > > -- > Regards, > Janmejay > http://codehunk.wordpress.com > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
