So between - function - keyword - function with named args ? On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't have concerns about some functions but going OO, lua or anything > Turing complete. > > Sent from phone, thus brief. > Am 22.05.2015 22:22 schrieb "singh.janmejay" <[email protected]>: > >> Just for clarity, by functions I mean in-built rainerscript functions, >> not user defined functions. >> >> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:49 AM, singh.janmejay >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I don't think a rich set of functions make it as complex as a >> > full-blown programming language. Majority of richness of a real >> > programming language comes from compositions over user-built >> > constructs. Functions are just allowing for richer manipulation of >> > control-flow and log-content, but not composition of user-created >> > constructs (say structs, objects and methods, closures etc). >> > >> > I personally feel things like include or hasItem should be available >> > as functions (external module sounds like an overkill for this). But >> > for xml-parsing, a separate module makes total sense. >> > >> > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:42 AM, singh.janmejay >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> At the risk of digressing a bit, in some benchmarks I did in 2013 >> >> luajit came out to be 2x to 4x faster, but its nowhere close to as >> >> pluggable, doesn't give very clean hookup points etc. >> >> If ever, i'd bet on Lua. >> >> >> >> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Marcus Rueckert <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-05-22 21:58:30 +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote: >> >>>> Use cases? >> >>>> (Maintenance) effort required? >> >>> >> >>> 10 years is quite some time. especially luajit seems to kick ass in the >> >>> speed department. look at Snabb Switch e.g. also the powerdns team >> >>> reported some nice numbers for their lua based things >> >>> (pdns,pdns-recursor,dnsdist). and nice speedups when they started >> >>> testing with luajit. >> >>> >> >>> darix >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux >> >>> openSUSE is good for you >> >>> www.opensuse.org >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> rsyslog mailing list >> >>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog >> >>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ >> >>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards >> >>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a >> myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if >> you DON'T LIKE THAT. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Janmejay >> >> http://codehunk.wordpress.com >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Janmejay >> > http://codehunk.wordpress.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Janmejay >> http://codehunk.wordpress.com >> _______________________________________________ >> rsyslog mailing list >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog >> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ >> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards >> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad >> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you >> DON'T LIKE THAT. >> > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of > sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T > LIKE THAT.
-- Regards, Janmejay http://codehunk.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
