On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:30, Panu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How is everyone dealing with their standard corporate email legal >> disclaimers on ticket replies? Refuse to give to give them any thought. They're worse than shrink-wrap licenses. A screen of BS for a 2 line response about how to fix a bug, brilliant!
Although if you are truly paranoid/trying to cover your ass, you could require a click through agreement to access a web view of the ticket, and have all notifications simply provide a URL to the latest transaction. This would also let you monitor who (by IP/# of visitors at least) was reading the ticket. > I personally hate them :) They have no other legal value than make > stupid people scared to sue for whatever reason. At least in most > European countries that is the case. But then, people sue other people > much less for stupid reasons than other side of the Atlantic :) Leave Brazil out of this please. -- Cambridge Energy Alliance: Save money. Save the planet. _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com