On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:16:18AM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> >The ManualFoo pages were from an attempt to have a techwriter write a
> >proper manual a good few years back. The intent had been that it was
> >going to be a for-money item, but we ended up posting the content
> >instead of charging for it. I'd be 100% ok with splitting the pages
> >into
> >logical sections, though I'd probably say that cutting to less than a
> >couple screens is probably too fine-grained.
>
> Sounds like we are on the same page. I'll see what I can do.
>
> Would it be okay if I dropped Manual from the front of the new page
> names? Every time I see "ManualApache" I think "configuring Apache
> by hand"... etc.
>
Certainly.
Will you leave the old page names as indexes to where the content went,
since there are folks outside the wiki who deeplink to those pages
today.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
