Demanding work be done by developers who kindly (ie for free) maintain open source software, in my opinion, borders on being plain rude. You are free to patch your own version of RT, or find alternative software which falls more in line with your expectations for ongoing development. The excuse of being tired and emotional only carries weight for so long.
Gordon Jo Rhett wrote: > See my reply. The part of the patch which you refused because it was > "well documented" breaks RT. Not fixing that isn't something you can > simply "document" -- RT falls over. Searches break. Pulling up > tickets break. Pulling reports on users work on tickets break. You > can't simply "document this behavior", it's a must-fix issue. _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
