Well, it looks to be an awesome extension for my group once it's working for us. :D
Yes, Googleish_Local.pm is in the right place. And yes, the text does show up on the simple search page. Looking more in the Apache logs, when adding a tag (even though it says "... added as a value for Tags" in the Result), I'm seeing this: [Tue Jul 28 18:11:21 2009] [error]: Scrip Prepare 11 died. - Require of RT::Action:: failed. Can't locate RT/Action/.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/rt3/bin/../local/lib /usr/local/rt3/local/plugins/RTx-Tags/lib /usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl . /etc/apache2) at (eval 843) line 3. Stack: [(eval 843):3] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Scrip_Overlay.pm:430] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Scrips_Overlay.pm:240] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Transaction_Overlay.pm:169] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Record.pm:1419] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Record.pm:1701] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Record.pm:1543] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm:1192] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm:1093] [/usr/local/rt3/share/html/Ticket/Modify.html:83] [/usr/local/rt3/share/html/autohandler:308] Stack: [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/ScripAction_Overlay.pm:173] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Scrip_Overlay.pm:430] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Scrips_Overlay.pm:240] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Transaction_Overlay.pm:169] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Record.pm:1419] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Record.pm:1701] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Record.pm:1543] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm:1192] [/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm:1093] [/usr/local/rt3/share/html/Ticket/Modify.html:83] [/usr/local/rt3/share/html/autohandler:308] (/usr/local/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Scrip_Overlay.pm:438) Jerrad Pierce wrote: >> No, the custom field search isn't working. > And local/plugins/RTx-Tags/lib/RT/Search/Googleish_Local.pm is in the > right place? > > If "Searching custom field values can be done with .CFieldName:keyword > e.g; .tags:spam. Negation is also permitted by prepending a - i.e; > -.tags:spam finds ham. Alternatively for tags, use the cloud of links > below:" does show up on the simple search page then your installation > is still broken. > >> Is that right? > Yes, as documented on the page. > > This isn't a very complicated extension, but a little hard to debug > without details. _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com