On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 12:54:57PM +1100, gekkoman wrote: > have tried multiple variations on this theme to no avail. > > I suspect a delve into the code base will be required. > > My best guess is this feature is not yet supported. > > One would be fine with this, except for the fact that if one edits the > ticket at a later stage it by default deletes the custom entry field of > content which is not ok.
As far as I know, the test suite has had tests for multiple value CFs for a while. If you believe you've found a bug, a patch extending t/web/command_line.t would be really helpful. -kevin > > sorry, noticed the syntax doesn't make sense O_o > > > > Should be more like this: > > > > set CF-'Field A'='item 1','item 2','item 3' > > > > > > -- Bart > > > > > > 2011/11/6 Bart <b...@pleh.info> > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I don't really have a setup where I can test this but you've mentioned > >> that the REST interface returns comma delimited list, have you tried > >> entering the CF value with a comma delimited entry? Something like this: > >> > >> CF-'Field A': 'item 1', 'item 2', 'item 3' > >> > >> When I have some time I'll see if I can test this in my testing > >> environment. > >> > >> -- Bart > >> > >> > >> > >> 2011/11/5 gekkoman <gekko...@illimitable.com> > >> > >>> Greetings, > >>> > >>> Is this possible? > >>> > >>> I can populate the custom field easily enough through the REST > >>> interface > >>> with the CF.{field name} format. > >>> > >>> Don't seem to be able to resolve this back to selections in a multiple > >>> entry CF. > >>> > >>> The REST interface itself returns comma delimited list when displaying > >>> a > >>> ticket with a multiple item CF selection, so it seems sensible to be > >>> able to pass the same result back to RT and have it yield the original > >>> result. This does not appear to work. > >>> > >>> > >>> More appropriate may be the ability to pass repetitive key definitions > >>> eg > >>> CF.{field name A}: Select Item 1 > >>> CF.{field name A}: Select Item 2 > >>> .. > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Tarek > >>> > >>> -- > >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and > >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >>> believed to be clean. > >>> > >>> -------- > >>> RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) > >>> * Barcelona, Spain November 28 & 29, 2011 > >>> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > -------- > > RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) > > * Barcelona, Spain November 28 & 29, 2011 > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -------- > RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) > * Barcelona, Spain November 28 & 29, 2011
pgpm1ywQzidYz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-------- RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Barcelona, Spain November 28 & 29, 2011