On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Robert Wysocki wrote:
> Dnia 2012-01-31, wto o godzinie 21:43 +0400, Ruslan Zakirov pisze:
> > 
> > Was it a mistake in encoding or just unsupported one? Anyway, it
> > should be reported as a bug report with more details about what was in
> > headers and what is actual encoding of the mail.
> 
> The actual encoding was iso-8859-2 and the declared one was iso-8852-2.
> I think it was i typo.

I think your options come down to:

running sed over your mail queue
temporary hack in RT::I18N::_CanonicalizeCharset
use Encode::Alias in the right place to 
    define_alias( "newName" => ENCODING)

-kevin

Attachment: pgpbKmuaK0Cxa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--------
RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5 & 6, 2012

Reply via email to