On 07/02/2004 09:17 AM Philippe Gerum wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 18:25, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Hi Philippe, >> >> I have sent the forwarded e-mail to the rtai-dev mailing list but it >> didn't arrive yet (maybe there is still a problem with switching to >> GNA). Maybe you can help? >> > > Nope, sorry. Dave handles this.
Hm, strange. My reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" made it to the list while my original mail got lost somehow. >> Furthermore, I'm not that far from checking the ARTI-PPC port in. >> Currently I'm using RTAI 3.0 (kilauea) but I assume it's better to >> switch immediately to RTAI 3.1 (vesuvio). >> > > Yes, kilauea being in a stable state, the second option is better. OK. Then I will switch to "vesuvio" a.s.a.p. Thanks. Wolfgang. >> Wolfgang. >> >> >> On 07/01/2004 05:07 PM Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have now a very first version of RTAI over ADEOS on PowerPC working on >> > my Icecube board and I can run sucessfully the tests in "rtai-testing". >> > Nevertheless, I'm a bit puzzled about the figures reported by the task >> > switching test "switches". With the old RTAI 24.1.12 I get: >> > >> > FOR 30 TASKS: TIME 2177 (ms), SUSP/RES SWITCHES 600000, >> > SWITCH TIME (INCLUDING FULL FP SUPPORT) 3628 (ns) >> > >> > >> > FOR 30 TASKS: TIME 2296 (ms), SEM SIG/WAIT SWITCHES 600000, >> > SWITCH TIME (INCLUDING FULL FP SUPPORT) 3827 (ns) >> > >> > and with the new ARTI: >> > >> > FOR 30 TASKS: TIME 1086 (ms), SUSP/RES SWITCHES 600000, >> > SWITCH TIME (INCLUDING FULL FP SUPPORT) 1810 (ns) >> > >> > >> > FOR 30 TASKS: TIME 2061 (ms), SEM SIG/WAIT SWITCHES 600000, >> > SWITCH TIME (INCLUDING FULL FP SUPPORT) 3436 (ns) >> > >> > Any ideas where the difference comes from. Especially why a suspend/ >> > resume is much faster? >> > >> > Wolfgang. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rtai-dev mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/rtai-dev
