On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 15:01, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 07/05/2004 01:10 PM Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 12:22, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> Hi Philippe, > >> > >> as announced, RTHAL is no longer supported in RTAI 3.1 on x86 but I > >> prefer to keep the legacy RTAI for PowerPC for one or two more releases. > >> Do you see a problem with configuration, names, etc.? > > > > No problem. 3.0 paved the way to this kind of combination for x86 which > > can/should be kept until the Adeos-based implementation is stable. > > Well, there are a few problems with vesuvio: > > - rtai-core/malloc/malloc.c includes rtai_hal.h directly (easy to fix).
Yep, <rtai.h> would be better. > - the RTAI scheduler files, apart from sched_up.h, now use the new > RTAI_* macros, e.g. RTAI_LATENCY_8254, which are not available in > legacy RTAI. > Namespace depollution. In any case, this is only an additional RTAI_ prefix, the meaning of the modified macros does not change. There is a rtai_oldnames.h files in x86 that provides for compatibility with the older naming scheme. > Wolfgang. > > _______________________________________________ > Rtai-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/rtai-dev -- Philippe.
