On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:04:26PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:04:22AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > Replace the open coded registration of the cdev and dev with the > > new device_add_cdev() helper. The helper replaces a common pattern by > > taking the proper reference against the parent device and adding both > > the cdev and the device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 19 +++---------------- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > > index c406343..935f0e9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > > @@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev, > > > > cdev_init(&chip->cdev, &tpm_fops); > > chip->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE; > > - chip->cdev.kobj.parent = &chip->dev.kobj; > > > > return chip; > > > > @@ -230,27 +229,16 @@ static int tpm_add_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > { > > int rc; > > > > - rc = cdev_add(&chip->cdev, chip->dev.devt, 1); > > + rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev); > > if (rc) { > > dev_err(&chip->dev, > > - "unable to cdev_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n", > > + "unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, > > err=%d\n", > > dev_name(&chip->dev), MAJOR(chip->dev.devt), > > MINOR(chip->dev.devt), rc); > > > > return rc; > > } > > > > - rc = device_add(&chip->dev); > > - if (rc) { > > - dev_err(&chip->dev, > > - "unable to device_register() %s, major %d, minor %d, > > err=%d\n", > > - dev_name(&chip->dev), MAJOR(chip->dev.devt), > > - MINOR(chip->dev.devt), rc); > > - > > - cdev_del(&chip->cdev); > > - return rc; > > - } > > - > > /* Make the chip available. */ > > mutex_lock(&idr_lock); > > idr_replace(&dev_nums_idr, chip, chip->dev_num); > > @@ -261,8 +249,7 @@ static int tpm_add_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > > > static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > { > > - cdev_del(&chip->cdev); > > - device_del(&chip->dev); > > + cdev_device_del(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev); > > > > /* Make the chip unavailable. */ > > mutex_lock(&idr_lock); > > -- > > 2.1.4 > > > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> > > I cannot test this at this point as security tree does not include > the commit that is dependent on this. I'm also wondering if this > commit is even going through my tree to upstream?
I can take it all at once through my tree. thanks, greg k-h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
