On 29/05/13 21:56, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 5/29/2013 2:35 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 29/05/13 21:14, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I think the use of _Objects_Name_to_id_u32 should be
calling rtems_task_ident.
The problem is that the idle threads are not RTEMS tasks. You cannot
find them with rtems_task_ident().
That's right. :(
It is still a violation of the layering. I wonder if we need a helper.
Using _Thread_Idle was also a violation, so nothing changes in this respect.
And the fast idle trick is also violating the layering. Grrr...
Also in a multi-core system, all the IDLE threads have the same name.
So you don't know which one you are getting. Is this OK based on
your test change?
This is a single processor test. On SMP this test is invalid.
FWIW it is not ok to have no tasks in the ready set.
Yes, the cardinality of the ready set must be greater than or equal to
the processor count.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : [email protected]
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
