Erik, On Aug 31, 2025, at 11:52 PM, Erik Kline via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ### S3.1 > > * "and the numbers produced by it are secure" > > Claiming "are secure" seems a bit imprecise. Perhaps "are sufficiently > secure for the BFD authentication purposes here" or something? > > ### S8 > > * "makes these attacks unfeasable" > > Should this be more like "computationally infeasible" or > "computationally intractable" or something?
I've chosen to address these comments by removing the claims. They don't add to the clarity fo the document and are difficult to substantiate. > > ## Nits > > ### S1 > > * "therefore define a Optimized" -> > "therefore defines an Optimized" > > ### S3.1 > > * "rates of hundred of packets per second" -> > "rates of hundreds of packets per second" ? Accepted. The above will be present in the next github PR for version 26. -- Jeff
