This second WG Last Call got absolutely no comments. Does this group of generally opinionated and thoughtful people truly have nothing to say? If so and given the previous WGLC succeeded, then on Oct 9, I will take silence as consent and indicate that on the draft shepherd's write-up...
Alia On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > This is to start a second Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-11. As you may recall, we successfully > completed a WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-10. After that, > there was concern about the use of ITU terminology (composite-link and NPO) > where the draft was not actually using the exact meaning specified by the > ITU. > > Therefore, it was decided to return the draft to the WG for a quick > terminology update (and also to address some other review comments). > > This WGLC will end on September 30. > > Thanks, > Alia >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
