On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 05:50:02PM +0000, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > Both, this document and abno are architectural frameworks and to my thinking > rtgwg as a good home for those. I'm glad to see support from the AD's here! > To second Alia - please do express your support/ lack of such, we would like > the decision to be driven by consensus (so far only "support" mails have been > received)
I think rtgwg is a good place for such things. For this document in particular, it did seem a better fit for GROW than rtgwg but as long as it's getting adopted somewhere. I had read a prior version of this document and support its adoption. I should read the latest rev at some point. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
