Chris, It is better to at least identify extensions and possible changes to existing standards now rather than later in the process. Can these be explicitly called out when the document status is changed to informational?
Thanks, Acee From: Chris Bowers <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 6:48 PM To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Routing WG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: WG adoption call for draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming Acee, The authors are OK with making this document informational. It is intended to provide a description of the different parts of an overall solution to this problem (with a few variants). Anything new that needs to be standardized will be addressed in separate documents in the appropriate working group. Thanks, Chris From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 5:27 PM To: Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; RTGWG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: WG adoption call for draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming Hi Jeff, The document is standards track. Can the authors summarize what is being standardized as opposed to informational? I think we need to determine whether this work belongs in RTGWG or 6MAN. Thanks, Acee From: rtgwg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 6:19 PM To: Routing WG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: WG adoption call for draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming draft as the working group document. RTGWG chairs have discussed the progress of the draft with v6ops chairs and got their blessing. Please indicate support or no-support by March 8th, 2017. IPR: If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email. of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Thanks, Jeff & Chris
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
