We published an updated version as a WG document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming/
We went ahead changed the status to informational and added text in sections 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 to clarify things regarding things that we think would need to be standardized elsewhere or not, as suggested by Acee. Please see the diff for the exact text: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-00.txt Please tell us if this text addresses the concern or not. There were a few other clarifications that we had accumulated in the text that we went ahead and published with this version as well. I I don't think they are controversial, but please check the diff, and they are certainly open to discussion. Chris On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear RTGWG, > > > > The poll has ended and there has been sufficient support to adopt the > > draft as the working group document. > > > > Authors, please republish as the working group document. > > > > Please update the draft to address Acee’s comment in the next revision. > > > > Cheers, > > Jeff > > *From: *rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Jeff Tantsura < > [email protected]> > *Date: *Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 6:19 PM > *To: *Routing WG <[email protected]> > *Cc: *"[email protected]" < > [email protected]>, rtgwg-chairs < > [email protected]> > *Subject: *WG adoption call for > draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming > > > > > Dear RTGWG, > > > > The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt > draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming > draft as the working group document. > > RTGWG chairs have discussed the progress of the draft with v6ops chairs > and got their blessing. > > Please indicate support or no-support by March 8th, 2017. > > IPR: > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to > this email. > > of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to > be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. > > The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been > received from each author and each > > individual that has contributed to the document. > > Thanks, > > Jeff & Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
