Support.
I think that it is important for IETF to continue to work towards
complete YANG models for managing network devices, and I see this work
as another part of that.
To the authors, please may I also suggest:
1) Referencing RFC 8340 for the tree diagram text in section 4. E.g. the
current explanation text could be replaced with something like:
The tree associated with the "ietf-rib-extensions" module follows. The
meaning of the symbols can be found in [RFC8340].
2) Perhaps adding the full tree output (i.e. inc the nodes from RFC8349)
into an appendix. As long as it is not too verbose, seeing the entire
structure can be helpful for folks checking completeness, and for
understanding the structure.
3) Adding some examples to the appendix. No need to do every
augmentation where the same groupings are being used, but seeing the
output can greatly help the reader properly understand the structure and
relationship between the data described in the model.
Thanks,
Rob
On 15/02/2019 19:18, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
Dear RTGWG,
The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt
draft-acee-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend
as the working group documents.
The authors have addressed the comments raised.
Please indicate support or no-support by March 3rd, 2019.
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please
respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of
any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG
mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage
until a response has been received from each author and each
individual that has contributed to the document.
Cheers,
Jeff
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
