Hi Rob, I’ve taken all your comments. However, I’ve deferred adding the examples as this is best done with confd and I don’t have time to get that all setup right now. Thanks, Acee
From: Robert Wilton <[email protected]> Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 6:19 AM To: Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>, Routing WG <[email protected]>, Routing WG <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: WG Adoption for "RIB YANG Data Model" - draft-acee-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend Resent-From: <[email protected]> Resent-To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]> Resent-Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 6:19 AM Support. I think that it is important for IETF to continue to work towards complete YANG models for managing network devices, and I see this work as another part of that. To the authors, please may I also suggest: 1) Referencing RFC 8340 for the tree diagram text in section 4. E.g. the current explanation text could be replaced with something like: The tree associated with the "ietf-rib-extensions" module follows. The meaning of the symbols can be found in [RFC8340]. 2) Perhaps adding the full tree output (i.e. inc the nodes from RFC8349) into an appendix. As long as it is not too verbose, seeing the entire structure can be helpful for folks checking completeness, and for understanding the structure. 3) Adding some examples to the appendix. No need to do every augmentation where the same groupings are being used, but seeing the output can greatly help the reader properly understand the structure and relationship between the data described in the model. Thanks, Rob On 15/02/2019 19:18, Jeff Tantsura wrote: Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-acee-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend as the working group documents. The authors have addressed the comments raised. Please indicate support or no-support by March 3rd, 2019. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Cheers, Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
