Khaled, Physical network topologies do not follow geo nor political boundaries. Any solution based on the above is simply not practical.
Best, R. On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:00 AM Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear RTGWG members, > > > > As you saw, I wasn’t able to present the KRP ID during the IETF 108 online > meeting due to personal reasons, but you still have the chance to read and > add your comments to make the draft take the best form to make progress, > all participants are encouraged to modify the recent version and if > something is unclear don’t hesitate to ask. > > > > Regards, > > > > Khaled Omar > > > > *From:* Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 11:36 PM > *To:* Khaled Omar <[email protected]>; rtgwg-chairs < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: KRP ID Discussion. > > > > Hi Khaled Omar, > > > > Instead of only asking me to review the draft, a better way is to send an > email to [email protected] and ask people to review it. You can include a > pointer to your slides as well, and people interested in this topic will > send their comments. > > > > Thanks, > > Yingzhen > > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:18 PM Khaled Omar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Yingzhen, > > > > As my online participation to discuss KRP was not successful, it will be > great if you read the draft and tell me your opinions, comments and > suggestions so we can work on it and move it to the next better form. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Khaled Omar > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
