Hi Khaled, Does this solution require hierarchical IPv4/IPv6 address re-allocation?
Regards, Shunwan From: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Khaled Omar Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 7:20 AM To: rtgwg <[email protected]> Subject: RE: KRP ID Discussion. Dear RTGWG members, As you saw, I wasn’t able to present the KRP ID during the IETF 108 online meeting due to personal reasons, but you still have the chance to read and add your comments to make the draft take the best form to make progress, all participants are encouraged to modify the recent version and if something is unclear don’t hesitate to ask. Regards, Khaled Omar From: Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 11:36 PM To: Khaled Omar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: KRP ID Discussion. Hi Khaled Omar, Instead of only asking me to review the draft, a better way is to send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> and ask people to review it. You can include a pointer to your slides as well, and people interested in this topic will send their comments. Thanks, Yingzhen On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:18 PM Khaled Omar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Yingzhen, As my online participation to discuss KRP was not successful, it will be great if you read the draft and tell me your opinions, comments and suggestions so we can work on it and move it to the next better form. Thanks, Khaled Omar
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
