This WG appears to be revisiting the issues of the expired trigtran wg. It 
might be useful to understand why that did not succeed and whether you are 
asking the same question twice and expecting a different answer. 

Joe

> On Aug 12, 2020, at 9:25 PM, Lizhenbin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> The APN mailing list has been created. If you have interest in the work, 
> please subscribe.
> 
> List address: [email protected]
> Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apn
> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apn
> 
> Purpose:
> This email list is the discussion list for the Application-aware Networking 
> (APN). Application-aware Networking is a mechanism whereby traffic flows can 
> be steered and routed within the network to ensure that the specific service 
> levels needed by applications can be delivered.  
> 
> This list belongs to IETF area: RTG
> 
> 
> Look forward to going on to have more discussion in the mailing list.
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards, 
> Zhenbin (Robin)
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: Architecture-discuss [[email protected]] 代表 
> Lizhenbin [[email protected]]
> 发送时间: 2020年7月29日 0:17
> 收件人: [email protected]; [email protected]
> 抄送: [email protected]
> 主题: [arch-d] APN (Application-aware Networking) Side Meeting
> 
> Hi All,
> We will have the APN side meeting at 12:30 - 14:00 UTC on July 30 (Thursday). 
> The agenda and the WebEx information is provided in the following link.
> https://github.com/APN-Community/IETF108-Side-Meeting-APN
> 
> There has been several similar work like APN such as SPUD and PLUS. Recently 
> Network Token work was also proposed. The side meeting is to try to clarify 
> the scope of APN comparing with other work. The possible usecases are also 
> proposed for the APN work. Another goal of the side meeting is to clarify the 
> security and privacy issues which are always proposed against such 
> application-ware networking work. In RTGWG session held yesterday, the 
> presentation of APN work discussed the possible scenarios related with the 
> security and privacy issues. The following slides is for your reference:
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-rtgwg-8-rtgwg-apn6-01
> 
> Since it is a complex cross-area work and there is much background 
> information, wish you could join the side meeting if you have interest in the 
> work and your comments and suggestions are appreciated.
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Daniel & Zhenbin (Robin)
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to