TRIGTRAN did look at signals both up and down the network stack. (Browser to OS to disk doesn’t involve that stack)
Joe > On Aug 14, 2020, at 8:11 PM, John Day <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, these are the ones who think that your browser should be able to tell > Windows what order to do the disk queue. > > John > >> On Aug 14, 2020, at 20:37, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This WG appears to be revisiting the issues of the expired trigtran wg. It >> might be useful to understand why that did not succeed and whether you are >> asking the same question twice and expecting a different answer. >> >> Joe >> >>> On Aug 12, 2020, at 9:25 PM, Lizhenbin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> The APN mailing list has been created. If you have interest in the work, >>> please subscribe. >>> >>> List address: [email protected] >>> Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apn >>> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apn >>> >>> Purpose: >>> This email list is the discussion list for the Application-aware Networking >>> (APN). Application-aware Networking is a mechanism whereby traffic flows >>> can be steered and routed within the network to ensure that the specific >>> service levels needed by applications can be delivered. >>> >>> This list belongs to IETF area: RTG >>> >>> >>> Look forward to going on to have more discussion in the mailing list. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Zhenbin (Robin) >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> 发件人: Architecture-discuss [[email protected]] 代表 >>> Lizhenbin [[email protected]] >>> 发送时间: 2020年7月29日 0:17 >>> 收件人: [email protected]; [email protected] >>> 抄送: [email protected] >>> 主题: [arch-d] APN (Application-aware Networking) Side Meeting >>> >>> Hi All, >>> We will have the APN side meeting at 12:30 - 14:00 UTC on July 30 >>> (Thursday). The agenda and the WebEx information is provided in the >>> following link. >>> https://github.com/APN-Community/IETF108-Side-Meeting-APN >>> >>> There has been several similar work like APN such as SPUD and PLUS. >>> Recently Network Token work was also proposed. The side meeting is to try >>> to clarify the scope of APN comparing with other work. The possible >>> usecases are also proposed for the APN work. Another goal of the side >>> meeting is to clarify the security and privacy issues which are always >>> proposed against such application-ware networking work. In RTGWG session >>> held yesterday, the presentation of APN work discussed the possible >>> scenarios related with the security and privacy issues. The following >>> slides is for your reference: >>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-rtgwg-8-rtgwg-apn6-01 >>> >>> Since it is a complex cross-area work and there is much background >>> information, wish you could join the side meeting if you have interest in >>> the work and your comments and suggestions are appreciated. >>> >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Daniel & Zhenbin (Robin) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Architecture-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Architecture-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Architecture-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
