Jen (and co-authors) - Thanx for reviving this work.
Can you comment on whether the need/use cases for this have changed/become more/less important in the intervening years? Do you also plan to revive https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-ipv6-dst-src-routing/ ? What routing protocols do you see as still relevant here? Thanx. Les > -----Original Message----- > From: rtgwg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jen Linkova > Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2022 3:41 PM > To: Routing WG <[email protected]> > Cc: David Lamparter <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-00 > > Hello, > > Some of you might remember draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing [1] which > expired a while ago. We'd like to revive the draft and get that work > done finally, so we've just submitted a replacement draft, > draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing. There are almost no changes to > the original draft, ex. the authors list and the name (as the original > draft expired, the new one is not a WG document but an individual > submission). > > Review, comments, ideas are highly appreciated/ > > References > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/ > > -- > SY, Jen Linkova on behalf of draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-00 authors. > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
