You never need this option except for using ExtractPhaseImageFilter <http://www.openrtk.org/Doxygen/classrtk_1_1ExtractPhaseImageFilter.html> but it makes the CPU version faster. So you don't need it if you only use the GPU version of FDK. I don't know anlything about ITK_USE_CUFFTW, it's a recent option I've never used... Cheers, Simon
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:01 PM C S <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > thank you very much for your swift answer! > > If compiling for GPU, I don't need ITK_USE_FFTWD or ITK_USE_FFTWF, right? > Would you recommend using ITK_USE_CUFFTW? > > > Best > Clemens > > Am Di., 2. Juli 2019 um 11:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Rit < > [email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> No yet! We aim at proposing this soon but it's not ready. The best >> practice is to build from ITK, turn on Module_RTK, RTK_USE_CUDA and >> ITK_WRAP_PYTHON. >> Someone has already requested a proper compilation doc, we'll work on it >> asap, sorry for the inconvenience. >> Simon >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 5:51 PM C S <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear RTK users, >>> >>> is there a possibility to get GPU support within RTK from the PyPI >>> package "itk-rtk"? >>> https://pypi.org/project/itk-rtk/ >>> >>> If not, what is the current "best practice" building RTK with GPU and >>> Python bindings? I'm on Ubuntu 18.04 with CUDA 10.0. >>> >>> >>> Thank you very much for your help! >>> Clemens >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rtk-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list [email protected] https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
