Hi, Yes, v2.0.1 is the defauts (see here <https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK/blob/master/Modules/Remote/RTK.remote.cmake>) but you can specify another tag as pointed out by Andreas. Best regards, Simon
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:14 PM Andreas Andersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Clemens > You can use the CMake variable, REMOTE_GIT_TAG_RTK, to set the tag of RTK > you want to use, e.g. master > I think the default value is v2.0.1 > > Best regards > Andreas > > __________________________________ > > Andreas Gravgaard Andersen > > Danish Center for Particle Therapy, > > Aarhus University Hospital > > Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 99, > > 8200, Aarhus > > Mail: [email protected] > > Cell: +45 3165 8140 > > > On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 20:01, C S <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Simon, >> >> I have a follow up question: When installing RTK as an ITK module as per >> your suggestion, which RTK version is used? Is the latest release (2.0.1) >> bundled with ITK or is the newest RTK pulled from Github? >> >> I ask this because I have a feeling I would benefit from using this >> commit >> <https://github.com/SimonRit/RTK/commit/99a6626f42e6654d11a780127610c95d3c1a063e> >> and >> am wondering what's the best pratice to install it. >> >> >> Thank you very much >> Clemens >> >> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:12 AM Simon Rit <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> You never need this option except for using ExtractPhaseImageFilter >>> <http://www.openrtk.org/Doxygen/classrtk_1_1ExtractPhaseImageFilter.html> >>> but it makes the CPU version faster. So you don't need it if you only use >>> the GPU version of FDK. I don't know anlything about ITK_USE_CUFFTW, it's a >>> recent option I've never used... >>> Cheers, >>> Simon >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:01 PM C S <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Simon, >>>> >>>> thank you very much for your swift answer! >>>> >>>> If compiling for GPU, I don't need ITK_USE_FFTWD or ITK_USE_FFTWF, >>>> right? Would you recommend using ITK_USE_CUFFTW? >>>> >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Clemens >>>> >>>> Am Di., 2. Juli 2019 um 11:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Rit < >>>> [email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> No yet! We aim at proposing this soon but it's not ready. The best >>>>> practice is to build from ITK, turn on Module_RTK, RTK_USE_CUDA and >>>>> ITK_WRAP_PYTHON. >>>>> Someone has already requested a proper compilation doc, we'll work on >>>>> it asap, sorry for the inconvenience. >>>>> Simon >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 5:51 PM C S <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear RTK users, >>>>>> >>>>>> is there a possibility to get GPU support within RTK from the PyPI >>>>>> package "itk-rtk"? >>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/itk-rtk/ >>>>>> >>>>>> If not, what is the current "best practice" building RTK with GPU and >>>>>> Python bindings? I'm on Ubuntu 18.04 with CUDA 10.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much for your help! >>>>>> Clemens >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Rtk-users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> Rtk-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users >> >
_______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list [email protected] https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
