On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Dmitri A Sergatskov wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Erwin Rol wrote:
> > RH 7.x has a bad compiler, use a other compiler. I think
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> No, rh71 does not have a bad compiler. RH7.1 has a very good
> compiler,
That turns out not to be the case.
> Erwin, you do not know what you are talking about and
> just through monkey shit around.
> For gcc-2.96RH issues I recommend reading http://www.bero.org/gcc296.html.
This kind of ad hominem attack strikes me as completely inappropriate for
this mailing list. Please cut it out.
For another side to the gcc-2.96 issue see:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-2.96.html
who after all are the maintainers. For what it's worth I personally have
found errors when compiling the linux kernel, which were immediately
resolved by downloading 2.95.3 instead.
Cheers,
Richard Reeve.
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
